attorneylawyerbook logo

MDVIP Lawsuit

>>Lawsuits>>
MDVIP Lawsuit

MDVIP, a prominent concierge medicine company, faces two major lawsuits and numerous individual claims raising concerns about malpractice, competition, and marketing practices. While the company denies wrongdoing, these legal challenges cast a shadow on the industry and prompt careful consideration before joining such practices.

Detailed Breakdown:

  • Beber v. MDVIP (2013):
    • Claim: Misdiagnosed leg infection led to patient’s death, with MDVIP liable for doctor’s negligence and deceptive marketing.
    • Outcome: Jury awarded $8.5 million in 2015, but overturned on appeal in 2017.
  • SignatureMD v. MDVIP (2014):
    • Claim: MDVIP’s dominant market position stifles competition in the concierge medicine sector.
    • Status: Ongoing lawsuit awaiting resolution.
  • Additional Lawsuits: Individual claims against MDVIP for malpractice, breach of contract, and fraud.
  • MDVIP’s Response: Denial of all wrongdoing in all lawsuits.

Considerations for Potential Concierge Medicine Patients:

  • Lack of Government Regulation: Research the practice thoroughly before committing.
  • Additional Fees: Expect monthly/annual fees on top of medical service costs.
  • Smaller Patient Panels: Easier access to doctors due to fewer patients.
  • Potential Additional Services: Same-day appointments, house calls, etc.

Weighing the Pros and Cons: Carefully evaluate the benefits and drawbacks before joining a concierge medicine practice, like MDVIP. Scrutinize contracts before signing.

Complete Date Case Citation Court Short Summary
2013 Beber v. MDVIP (Appealed) U.S. District Court (Specific District Unclear) Misdiagnosed infection, malpractice claim & marketing concerns. $8.5M awarded, then overturned.
2014 SignatureMD v. MDVIP (Pending) U.S. District Court (Specific District Unclear) Antitrust claim: Stifling competition in concierge medicine market.
2013-Present Individual Lawsuits (Various) Various Courts Medical malpractice, breach of contract, fraud claims against MDVIP.

Remember: This information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.