Cartiva implant Lawsuits

1. In re: Cartiva DePuy Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation: This ongoing multidistrict litigation consolidates hundreds of individual lawsuits filed against DePuy, alleging various defects in their Cartiva Pinnacle hip implants, including metal-on-metal wear, instability, and revision surgery complications. Plaintiffs seek compensation for pain, suffering, medical expenses, and other damages.

2. John Doe v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.: This individual lawsuit represents one of the many cases encompassed by the larger multidistrict litigation. It specifically focuses on the injuries allegedly caused by a Cartiva Pinnacle hip implant in a single patient (John Doe). The specific details of the alleged defect and injuries are unavailable due to ongoing litigation.

3. Bell v. Johnson & Johnson: This landmark case resulted in a significant jury verdict against DePuy in August 2022. The plaintiffs, citing pain and the need for revision surgery due to a Cartiva Pinnacle hip implant, were awarded $540 million in compensatory and punitive damages. This verdict could influence future litigation involving similar claims.

4. In re: DePuy Pinnacle Acetabular Cup Products Liability Litigation: Similar to the multidistrict litigation for hip implants, this case consolidates lawsuits against DePuy pertaining to alleged defects in their Cartiva Pinnacle acetabular cup implants. Plaintiffs allege similar issues of wear, instability, and revision surgery complications, seeking compensation for associated damages.

Important Note: This information is based on publicly available court records and may not be complete or accurate. For legal advice, please consult with an attorney.