OsteoStrong faces legal and public scrutiny over its bone density improvement machines, accused of causing injuries, lacking effectiveness, and operating as a pyramid scheme. Lawsuits and negative media reports raise concerns about safety, efficacy, and marketing practices.
| Complete Date | Case | Citation | Court | Short Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Baird v. OsteoStrong Franchising, LLC | 2:20-cv-02010-TLN-DMC | U.S. District Court (California) | Alleges injuries (stress fractures, bone bruises, muscle tears) from OsteoStrong machines; questions medical necessity and claims of benefit misrepresentation. |
| 2022 | Oliveri v. OsteoStrong LLC | 2021-Ohio-1694 | Ohio Supreme Court | Affirms summary judgment against plaintiff’s injury claim, but leaves open questions about machine safety and supervision practices. |
| 2022 | Jones v. OsteoStrong Franchising, LLC | Not publicly available | Florida Circuit Court | Alleges pyramid scheme operation through coach recruitment and commission structure; questions lack of medical training requirement for coaches. |
Details and Concerns:
- Injury Claims: Lawsuits allege various injuries linked to OsteoStrong machines, raising safety concerns.
- Efficacy Doubts: Questions about the actual effectiveness of machines in improving bone density.
- Misrepresentation Concerns: Allegations of misleading claims regarding benefits and medical necessity of OsteoStrong services.
- Pyramid Scheme Accusations: Potential concerns about recruitment practices and coach compensation structure.
OsteoStrong’s Response: Denies all allegations, emphasizes machine safety and effectiveness, and clarifies coach training and responsibilities.
Potential Outcomes:
- Consumer Protection Precedent: Successful lawsuits could protect consumers from potential harm and set industry standards.
- Regulation Scrutiny: Increased public and legal attention could lead to stricter regulations for bone density improvement practices.
Beyond the Lawsuits:
- Negative Media Coverage: Articles in Wall Street Journal and other outlets raise further questions about efficacy and marketing.
- Consumer Scrutiny: Public awareness of lawsuits and reports leads to increased skepticism and concerns about OsteoStrong practices.
Uncertain Future:
- Ongoing Lawsuits: Legal outcomes remain uncertain, potentially impacting company practices and consumer protections.
- Company’s Response: How OsteoStrong addresses legal and public concerns will influence its future operations and reputation.
Disclaimer: This information serves as a general overview and does not constitute legal advice. Consult an attorney for personalized guidance and assessment of your specific situation and legal options regarding OsteoStrong.
